[OSM-talk] tagging long distance footpaths (and other named footpaths)
peter.miller at itoworld.com
Tue Oct 23 21:52:04 BST 2007
I am in your hands guys. I see the merit of using the relationships as this
allows all sorts of tagging options and I am happy to try it that way. If so
we would have to agree the tag values to be used within the relationship to
specify the correct category of path (long distance European etc).
Is that easier than splitting semicolons(using the ncn,rcn type tags)?
Is there really a bigger decision to make about tagging routes in general?
and when should we make it?
The general motto of 'render and they will come' may apply. Possibly I will
wait until someone starts rendering this stuff and then follow their lead.
> Message: 10
> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:34:20 +0100
> From: David Earl <david at frankieandshadow.com>
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] tagging long distance footpaths (and other
> named footpaths)
> To: Mike Collinson <mike at ayeltd.biz>
> Cc: talk at openstreetmap.org
> Message-ID: <471E3EAC.8020500 at frankieandshadow.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> On 23/10/2007 19:29, Mike Collinson wrote:
> > route= could be used now.
> The trouble with the simple route tag is that you can't have a way where
> there is more than one route along it, which Peter was specifically
> wanting to do.
More information about the talk