[OSM-talk] Tagging of areas with holes
80n80n at gmail.com
Tue Oct 30 19:10:00 GMT 2007
On 10/30/07, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> Hi 80n,
> > Nothing has yet been implemented for Osmarender AFAIK.
> I'm pretty sure you implemented "multipolygon" support yourself, by
> simply treating all ways inside a multipolygon relationship as if they
> were disjunct parts of the same way, and thus exactly replicating the
> old behaviour!
I cut some code, yes, but don't remember if I got it working - I seem to
think there were bugs or something...
Or was that someone else?
> This means that while it is true that we'd meanwhile like relation
> members to be tagged "outer" and "inner", for them to look right in
> Osmarender you should (also) make sure that (like in olden times) the
> outer ring runs in a different direction than the inner ring(s).
> David Stubbs:
> > Do the individual ways need to be tagged as landuse=forest; or is it
> > the multipolygon relationship which needs to be tagged as
> > landuse=forest; or do the individual ways and the multipolygon
> > relationship need to be tagged as landuse = forest?
> In the long run it would make sense to tag (only) the relation I
> think, but we're not there yet; currently you need to tag the ways
We have to agree on whether tags on relations override tags on ways, or vice
> Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00.09' E008°23.33'
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk