[OSM-talk] Tagging climbing routes and scrambles
Andy Allan
gravitystorm at gmail.com
Fri Apr 18 18:15:46 BST 2008
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Tom Hughes <tom at compton.nu> wrote:
> In message <c4193f8c0804180644o7931daf0w774d23e74928f71a at mail.gmail.com>
>
> Andy Allan <gravitystorm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ah, I see the problem. You are taking a tag away from it's context,
> > and then complaining that the tag has no context on its own. Only part
> > of your argument is based around conflicts, but the rest seems to be
> > context.
> >
> > How do I tell that name="The Duke's Head" refers to the name of a pub?
> > I don't feel the need for amenity:pub:name= and highway:primary:name=
> > in order to solve this issue. Instead, I examine the context of the
> > original tag, and find that it is the name of a pub.
>
> Because the name tag is always the name of an object, regardless of
> what that object is (the amenity=pub tells you what sort of object it
> is in this case). It is clear to everybody that a name tag is going
> to tell you the name of something without having to know anything else
> about it.
>
> It is not clear to anybody outside a very specific community what
> a tag called "french" is likely to mean.
Maybe "french" is a bad choice, and is colouring the discussion too
much. I don't think this choice of tag warrants namespaces though.
I look at the proposed "climbing:rock=limestone" and wonder to what
possible information the 'climbing' conveys, other than needless
typing. Surely it's just rock=limestone?
Cheers,
Andy
More information about the talk
mailing list