[OSM-talk] Nested areas
rvollmert-lists at gmx.net
Fri Jun 6 08:47:49 BST 2008
On Jun 6, 2008, at 09:09, spaetz wrote:
> But if you tag a river universally over quite a bit with layer=-1
> just for the fun of it, as was in the original example, then this
> looks weird. And osmarender is right to make it look weird, isn't it?
I think this can be correct, if say a river runs in a river bed that's
dug into to the landscape. So the surface of the river is always say
2m below the surrounding areas. Bridges over the river are flat.
More information about the talk