[OSM-talk] Wanted feature for API 0.7 ??
peter.doerrie at googlemail.com
Mon Jun 8 13:19:57 BST 2009
Whatever you say. I dont have the hacking chops needed to fully understand
the APi and how it works. But I am really interested in seeing some form of
"lifespan feature" implemented in OSM. So it would be grate if this
discussion makes some progress in getting closer to that goal.
2009/6/8 Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>
> Peter Dörrie wrote:
>> in the (albeit short) discussion concerning my proposal to introduce tags
>> for feature lifecylcles (
>> the outcome was that it has to be included server-side.
> Some kind of general, improved filtering server-side makes sense (for
> example using a few standard tags and then, for example, have editors
> generally request only objects that do not have an "ancient" tag or so ;-)
> But the kind of logic that was suggested here, where the API filters by
> itself and when a "delete" request is issued, instead modifies some tags, is
> certainly not the way to go.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk