[OSM-talk] "There Is No Cabal"
frederik at remote.org
Wed Mar 4 01:08:27 GMT 2009
Ulf Möller wrote:
> After *three days* of analyzing the licence text, people figure out that
> it doesn't actually require ShareAlike for commercial derived maps,
I think we're seeing a slight problem with the wording here that has
been overlooked, not a problem of the magnitude you describe, and
certainly nothing to do with commercial vs. non-commercial.
> then it emerges that this was an intentional change requested by the OSM
I haven't seen this emerging anywhere. (In fact, the OSM foundation,
represented by their board of directors, seems to have been remarkably
un-involved as we have heard from 80n who serves on the board.)
Assuming you're talking about the issue we raised on odc-discuss, I
currently tend to thing it is a cockup rather than a conspiracy.
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the talk