[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - boolean values
konrad at skeri.com
Sun Oct 4 07:35:45 BST 2009
Did you read all I wrote? What do you think I mean with "If we want to
specify the type you are of course welcome to do that, e.g.
bridge=viaduct or electrified=contact_line" and "These are only
examples where yes|no could be used. Other descriptive values are
still valid, e.g. bridge=viaduct or electrified=contact_line"?
We should replace a quantilbillion of different boolean values with yes|no.
Instead of bridge=ja, use bridge=yes
Instead of bridge=japp, use bridge=yes
Instead of bridge=da, use bridge=yes
Instead of bridge=jepp, use bridge=yes
Instead of bridge=jupp, use bridge=yes
Instead of bridge=oui, use bridge=yes
Instead of bridge=sant, use bridge=yes
Instead of bridge=riktigt, use bridge=yes
Instead of bridge=recht, use bridge=yes
Instead of bridge=korrekt, use bridge=yes
Instead of bridge=påhederochsamvete, use bridge=yes
But if it is an viaduct and you want to specify it, then use bridge=viaduct.
I _nowhere_ wrote that bridge should only accept boolean values, but
if we mean to input a boolean value, we should have ONE boolean value.
2009/10/4 John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>:
> 2009/10/4 Konrad Skeri <konrad at skeri.com>:
>> boolean values are allowed. Instead of bridge=jomenvisst we should use
>> bridge=yes, and instead of electrified=naltaseotroligt we should use
> Bridge isn't listed as boolean only, you can also have bridge=viaduct
> which I've used a few times.
> Other values listed on the map features page are aquaduct and swing.
More information about the talk