[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (man_made=mineshaft)
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Wed Oct 28 16:16:46 GMT 2009
2009/10/28 Lesi <lesi at lesi.is-a-geek.net>
> > how do you define "main area"?
> > Aren't the shafts vertical access / ventilation shafts that
> > lead to the inner mine? IMHO that defines them as
> > part of the mine (and indicates that they should be comprised).
> The main area is the area where all the bigger buildings of the mine are.
IMHO the mine is the mine, not buildings. The buildings are buildings (also
as tag: building=xy). They could/should be also comprised in the mine
> airshaft could be a single node outside of this area
-> inside of the mining area (which would be underground but in projection
still occupy the same space).
> You almost always know the name of the mine. But it is too complicated to
> create a relation for the mineshaft, to assosiate it with that mine -
> escpecially when only the mineshaft is mapped.
It's not more complicated than any other relation: just add all parts as
members. The easiest case is just the mineshaft beeing mapped: the relation
then has only one member (till other parts get added/mapped).
> All mineshafts i know have their own name. That's why you cannot use the
> name-tag for the name of the mine.
> So at the moment there are:
> name -> name of the mineshaft itself
> mine -> name of the mine which the mineshaft is part of
> operator -> name of the operator of the mine
OK, seems reasonable (and easy to map, what is always important in OSM).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk