[OSM-talk] Frederik declares war on data imports...
80n80n at gmail.com
Sun Aug 8 13:20:33 BST 2010
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>wrote:
> 80n wrote:
>> Isn't it going to present some complicated management problems if the
>> LWG changes the contributor terms at this stage in the process?
> No, not in this case. The proposal is a subset of the powers currently
> available to OSMF, not a superset. It is the existing CT _minus_ the option
> of future relicensing (with a clarification on asserting rights in any
> derivative database combined entirely of contributions by PD users).
> Therefore OSMF need not treat the two groups separately as long as it does
> not exert the future licence change option for the 30,000 'CT 1.0' signups.
> Richard, that's very true in this case. But the LWG still needs a mandate
to make this change. They can't do it just because Richard asked nicely.
What's the mechanism by which they can make changes to the contributor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk