[OSM-talk] New tool in Potlatch 2 for areas that share a way
stevagewp at gmail.com
Tue Feb 1 02:37:10 GMT 2011
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:48 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
<dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> probably no. Landuse is describing the actual usage of the land. If
> there is only grass, it cannot be considered industrial, regardless of
> who owns the land.
Problem with that ruling is you would end up with tiny little
odd-shaped pockets of "industry" separated by space. Whereas I think a
large, unbroken region like this: http://osm.org/go/uGt0Ttv7- is
actually a lot more informative.
Furthermore, you might be reduced to categorising individual elements
of the factory. Would the administrative wing really be
landuse=industrial? Surely it should be landuse=commercial. etc etc.
I don't think there's any single answer that can give the right
information to every consumer. Sometimes OSM has to make actual
choices between different uses of the data.
More information about the talk