[OSM-talk] The Future of Areas
emj at kth.se
Tue Mar 29 09:07:08 BST 2011
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Jochen Topf <jochen at remote.org> wrote:
> Some people (including me) are not happy with the way we represent areas in
On those pages you mention: "This could lead to objects with 10.000
points and more" isn't this a separate problem that exist today, and
will be continue to be a problem for every area scheme that you list.
Except you will need to handle it manually by splitting up
ways/areas/relations like we do now? I agree that the side effects
from manually splitting ways, areas and relations differ alot.
So wont solving the problem with editing huge datastructures in OSM be
important regardless what area type gets used.
More information about the talk