[OSM-talk] [talk-au] [sharedmapau] Re: Mass revert now??
toby.murray at gmail.com
Tue Jan 10 15:24:28 GMT 2012
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:45 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com> wrote:
> It surely no longer is to have the most accurate map, all the
> remapping is usually from lower quality data sources, and time spent
> remapping could have been spent making the map better, that hardly
> seems like a very pragmatic approach to me.
Speak for yourself. A couple of my remapping changesets contain the following:
deletions: 89/creations: 501
deletions: 201/creations: 426
Some have more deletions than additions but that is because the
original TIGER import was over-noded anyway.
Some of these ways haven't been touched since Bing imagery became
available. I'm guessing improvements are probably more the norm than
reductions in quality.
More information about the talk