[OSM-talk] Critical Mass for license change-over
mikel_maron at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 28 13:30:08 GMT 2012
So look. There have been many reasonable questions and discussions on this topic, good.
But moderation in still going to happen (is happening) on inflammatory posts and attacks.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
> From: Nick Hocking <nick.hocking at gmail.com>
>To: talk at openstreetmap.org
>Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 1:49 AM
>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Critical Mass for license change-over
>>On 28 January 2012 05:43, Nick Hocking <nick.hocking en gmail.com> wrote:
>> NE2/NE3 (Nathan) wrote
>>> "This condescending tone isn't useful. We should all care about the
>>> entire map, not just our little area."
>>So which part of this quote do you not agree with?
>It's the hypocrisy of one of the licence change whingers
>telling someone like Frederik that he should
>"care about the entire map"
>This hyprocrisy beggers belief.
>For about a year we have been inundated with whinging
>about "you can't change the licence because I don't
>agree with the decisions of the licence debate/votes".
>Now, when we are finally about to resolve the tainted
>data issues, all we see are the licence whingers desperately
>wailing "you can't change the licence for 60 or 70 years" (1)
>because we may lose some roads and I'm not about to do any hard
>work to remap them for the project".
>If the licence whingers could put a sock in it, that'd be great.
>If they could help with the remapping that would be even better,
>but I'm probably hoping for too much there.
>(1) I always exaggerate
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk