On 6/21/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Matthias Julius</b> <<a href="mailto:lists@julius-net.net">lists@julius-net.net</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Richard Fairhurst <<a href="mailto:richard@systemeD.net">richard@systemeD.net</a>> writes:<br><br>>> I was thinking about that before. We could invent highway=virtual to<br>>> connect POIs to the road system.
<br>><br>> Wouldn't the original point of this discussion - Advanced<br>> Relationships - do the trick?<br><br>Yes, certainly. It would just take longer to implement.</blockquote><div><br>Some renderers might decide to render anything with an unrecognised highway tag in a default colour. It might be better to use virtual=link, or relationship=is_in or something.
<br><br>If/when real relationships get implemented it would be feasible to convert all such tagged items at that time.<br><br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Matthias<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>talk mailing list<br><a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk">
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk</a><br></blockquote></div><br>