David<br>Nothing has yet been implemented for Osmarender AFAIK.<br><br>You might want to look at the pattern that was used to convert 0.4 areas to 0.5 relations for a clue about how it might get implemented.<br><br>I've not yet had any time to look at it more closely.
<br><br>80n<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/30/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">David Groom</b> <<a href="mailto:reviews@pacific-rim.net">reviews@pacific-rim.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Just a couple of questions relating to areas with holes and multipolygon<br>relations.<br><br>Firstly do mapnik and osmarender currently support the rendering of this<br>type of relation?<br><br>Secondly how exactly is this tagged. I understand ( I think ) how to
<br>actually create the relation, but am unsure what needs to be tagged. Do the<br>individual ways need to be tagged as landuse=forest; or is it the<br>multipolygon relationship which needs to be tagged as landuse=forest; or do
<br>the individual ways and the multipolygon relationship need to be tagged as<br>landuse = forest?<br><br>David<br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>talk mailing list<br><a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">
talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk</a><br></blockquote></div><br>