<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16809" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=084123722-24022009><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>... fair comment ... the English/Welsh system is indeed
pretty much unique - so the two level key is not a bad idea - apart from the
large number of paths already tagged! (:>)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV align=left><FONT face=Magneto color=#0000ff size=2>Mike Harris</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> Gustav Foseid [mailto:gustavf@gmail.com]
<BR><B>Sent:</B> 24 February 2009 17:41<BR><B>To:</B> osm<BR><B>Subject:</B>
Re: [OSM-talk] amenity=doctor or amenity=doctors ?
[tagging]<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><BR><BR>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Mike Harris <SPAN
dir=ltr><<A
href="mailto:mikh43@googlemail.com">mikh43@googlemail.com</A>></SPAN>
wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">Nick<BR><BR>Again
I find myself in almost complete agreement with you. I
found<BR>highway=cycleway a particularly difficult concept given that
bicycle rights<BR>are somewhat ill-defined in rights-of-way lore
(notwithstanding the 1968<BR>Countryside Act).</BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><BR>They do, however, make pretty much sense in many other parts of the
world. I see no good reason why the (very UK specific) right of way tags
should not be something like uk_row:foot=, uk_row:briddleway= and so
on.<BR><BR> - Gustav <BR></DIV></DIV><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>