<div>The wiki link was wrong, try</div>
<div><a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/overview_ways#Fahrradstra.C3.9Fe">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/overview_ways#Fahrradstra.C3.9Fe</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Presumably these cycleroads have disappeared from Mapnik (and any other rendering that doesn't keep up with things that aren't in Map Features)?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Richard<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Heiko Jacobs <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:heiko.jacobs@gmx.de">heiko.jacobs@gmx.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Hello<br><br>For some sorts of cycleroads you may look at my images at<br><a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bycicle/overview_ways#Fahrradstra.C3.9Fe" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bycicle/overview_ways#Fahrradstra.C3.9Fe</a><br>
<br>first image:<br>cycleroad, no separate tracks fpr pedestrians, motor_vehicle=yes<br><br>second image:<br>the same with separate tracks for pedestrians, former residential<br><br>third image:<br>the same street, but now motor_vehicles=no!<br>
<br>all examples are tagged as highway=cycleway up to now, but that's looks<br>not very fine, especially at Mapnik...<br>Because it's not only a way (small), but a complete road (esp. im. 2 and 3)<br><br>So tuning the Osmarender style files I also supported rendering<br>
of cycleroads some months ago:<br><br>For "pedestrian designation" we have this order inside OSM:<br><br>1. highway=residential<br> no special designation for pedestrian, they have to use tracks/lanes<br> at the sides or, if not there, the roadway(? Fahrbahn in deutsch)<br>
and have to obey the vehicles<br>Osmarender renders as: white solid core, wide, grey solid casing<br><br>2. higway=living_street<br> designated for pedestrian, but vehicles are allowed with<br> "pedestrian speed"<br>
Osmarender renders as: white-pink (foot color) dashed, wide, grey solid cas.<br><br>3. highway=pedestrian<br> designeted for pedestrian, vehicles only for delivery at some times,<br> sometimes bicycle=yes, typically former complete roads, redisgnated<br>
Osmarender renders as: "foot color" solid core, wide, grey solid casing<br><br>4. highway=footway<br> designated for pedestrian, vehicles normally only for service<br> (street cleaning...)<br>Osmarender renders as: "foot color" solid core, small, grey dashed casing<br>
<br>5. highway=path<br> ...<br>Osmarender renders as: "grey core, small, grey dashed casing<br><br><br>This schema I adapted for bicycles inside Osmarender rules:<br><br>1. highway=residential<br> no special designation for bicycles, they have to use designated<br>
tracks/lanes at the sides or, if not there, the roadway(? Fahrbahn<br> in deutsch)<br>Osmarender renders as: white solid core, wide, grey solid casing<br><br>2. higway=cycleroad motor_vehicles|motorcar=yes<br> designated for bicycles, but motor vehicles are allowed with<br>
"bicycle speed"<br>Osmarender renders as: "bicycle color" dashed, wide, grey solid cas.<br><br>3. highway=cycleroad (other cases than m...=yes)<br> designeted for bicycles, normally not for motor vehicles<br>
(besides service?), typically former complete roads, redisgnated<br>Osmarender renders as: "bicycle color" solid core, wide, grey solid casing<br><br>4. highway=cycleway<br> designated for bicycle, motor vehicles normally only for service<br>
(street cleaning...)<br>Osmarender renders as: "bicycle color" solid core, small, grey dashed casing<br><br>5. highway=path<br> ...<br>Osmarender renders as: "grey core, small, grey dashed casing<br><br>
<br>So Osmarender is prepared to render cycleroad.<br><br>I just don't have a testing environment for Mapnik, so I yet couldn't<br>prepare rendering of cycleroads in Mapnik...<br>Because of different styles (cycleway/footway as dashed line instead<br>
of core/casing, living_street uses a strange style not suitable for<br>this type of road, access-rendering uses styles that Osmarender uses<br>similar for living_streets) it might be a problem to find proper<br>solutions for rendering 1. to 5. for foot and bicycle more pleasant<br>
<br><br>highway=cycleroad is the tagging most suitable to the existing<br>tagging scheme ath this end of highways (residential-living_street-<br>pedestrian-footway-path) so I vote for this.<br><br>cycleway is not suitable to the appearance of most cycleroads in real live<br>
<br>residential is not suitable to the designation of cycleroads (and<br>living_street and pedestrian as also often former roads)<br><br> MfG Heiko Jacobs Z! IRCnet Mueck<br><font color="#888888">--<br>
Douglasstr. 30, D-76133 Karlsruhe fon +49 721 24069 fax 2030542<br>Geo-Bild Ing.b?ro geo-bild-KA.de Internet-Service <a href="http://auch-rein.de/" target="_blank">auch-rein.de</a><br>Couleurstud. Infos <a href="http://cousin.de/" target="_blank">cousin.de</a> VCD, umwelt&verkehr KA <a href="http://umverka.de/" target="_blank">umverka.de</a><br>
</font>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5"><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>talk mailing list<br><a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>