<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">During the discussions I and
other pointed out that man_made=mast is already used, but the "process"
continued. There's no such thing as valid. It is the *open*
streetmap, i.e. all tags are equally valid (which I also pointed out in
the discussion in December 2007). I do think that the discussions
around the RFC process can be useful, but the power of crowd-sourcing
wins out: if people like it they use, if not they don't.</font> My
vote (by adding tags) is man_made=mast. Documentation is another
matter. <br>
<br>
Cheers, Chris<br>
<br>
Simon Wood wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:20090713094112.245e8936@bourne" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:30:16 +0100
"Ed Loach" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ed@loach.me.uk"><ed@loach.me.uk></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">It does know man_made=mast
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Which does not have a page on the wiki, and is not listed on the 'man_made' page
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Man_made">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Man_made</a>
So I guess that it's not valid either. It seems that this little corner of OSM is a little muddled, if you can add comments to the discussion page(s) I'll try to help sort this out.
Simon.
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>