Yes, that's right, usually regular couples go there. Should I propose a new tag?<br><br>Cheers,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/7/29 Ulf Lamping <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ulf.lamping@googlemail.com">ulf.lamping@googlemail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Joseph Scanlan schrieb:<br>
<div class="im">> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Well, I would tag them completely differently. It is a different kind<br>
>> of object, it is not a Motel where you just pay according to a<br>
>> different fee system / business modell.<br>
><br>
> Around here I would not use a separate tag. No-Tell Motels must show a<br>
> little discretion. Hourly rate is a pretty clear hint as to what people<br>
> are doing there (not sleeping) but it still looks like a motel on the<br>
> outside.<br>
><br>
> Places that are more open could very well have businesses that deserve a<br>
> special tag. For example, I wouldn't tag any business in Clark County<br>
> as a brothel, the brothels look like other businesses and the<br>
> prostitutes will go somewhere else when the location draws too much<br>
> attention from law enforcement. In other Nevada counties, were<br>
> prostitution is legal, a brothel tag makes sense. These are clearly<br>
> labeled, well established businesses.<br>
><br>
> Just my point of view from a rather atypical city in the US desert south<br>
> west.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>You seem to think about an "inofficial brothel", as prostitution is<br>
illegal in some parts of nevada.<br>
<br>
IIRC the brazilian "love hotels" are often used by "regular couples" (so<br>
probably no "business" involved). Because the couple still lives at<br>
their parents, not married, or whatever. IIRC, this kind of "motel" is<br>
also known in japan.</blockquote><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Yes, I guess it makes sense to tag them special, as a normal traveller<br>
probably wouldn't want to stay there.<br>
<br>
As we already have amenity=brothel, why not use amenity=love_hotel for this?<br>
<br>
Regards, ULFL<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Arlindo Saraiva Pereira Jr.<br><br>Bacharelando em Sistemas de Informação - UNIRIO - <a href="http://uniriotec.br">uniriotec.br</a><br>Consultor de Software Livre da Uniriotec Consultoria - <a href="http://uniriotec.com">uniriotec.com</a><br>
<br>Acadêmico: <a href="mailto:arlindo.pereira@uniriotec.br">arlindo.pereira@uniriotec.br</a><br>Profissional: <a href="mailto:arlindo.pereira@uniriotec.com">arlindo.pereira@uniriotec.com</a><br>Geral: <a href="mailto:contato@arlindopereira.com">contato@arlindopereira.com</a><br>
Tel.: +5521 92504072<br>Jabber/Google Talk: <a href="mailto:nighto@nighto.net">nighto@nighto.net</a><br>Skype: nighto_sumomo<br>Chave pública: BD065DEC<br>