<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16890" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=171233609-13082009><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>... and in England you are forbidden to cycle on all
designated footways unless explicitly allowed! It neatly makes the point about
regional differences.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV align=left><FONT face=Magneto color=#0000ff size=2>Mike Harris</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> Gustav Foseid [mailto:gustavf@gmail.com]
<BR><B>Sent:</B> 12 August 2009 19:04<BR><B>To:</B> Talk
Openstreetmap<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [OSM-talk] Proliferation of path vs.
footway<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Nop <SPAN
dir=ltr><<A href="mailto:ekkehart@gmx.de">ekkehart@gmx.de</A>></SPAN>
wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">
<DIV class=im>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">highway=footway
(not suitable)<BR>bicycle=yes (but allowed)<BR>bicycle=dedicated
(signed)<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></DIV>A footway for cycling is not a valid
combination to me.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR>In Norway you are allowed to
cycle on all footways, unless explicitly forbidden.<BR><BR> -
Gustav<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>