On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Richard Fairhurst <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:richard@systemed.net">richard@systemed.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
In other words: If you want to use OSM data without attribution or<br>
share-alike, you may do so by distributing the program that makes the<br>
derivative, rather than the derivative itself. This is perfectly permissible<br>
under CC-BY-SA.<br></blockquote><div><br>And is perfectly permissible under ODbL. "This License does not apply to computer programs used in the making
or operation of the Database"<br><br>I'd like a response to this. And I'd also like a response to my question about what license is going to be used for "the Contents". Is it "the Database Contents License"?</div>
</div>