<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jm@liotier.org">jm@liotier.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
That would be using a map as an item in a to-do list. It would look ugly<br>
to me and I doubt that many people would support that use. Better keep<br>
the todo list separate - in another layer if you want it represented<br>
geographically.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Yes and no. A straight line works almost as well for routing as a correctly surveyed road, and much better than a non-existent way. So rather than a "to do list", it's more like a first draft.<br>
<br>You might say that in order of priority, we would like the following information about every road:<br>1) Start and end point<br>2) Major junctions<br>3) Name<br>4) Minor junctions<br>5) Exact route.<br>6) Surface<br>7) Width, lanes, speed limit...<br>
<br>The order is debatable though.<br><br>Steve<br>