On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:40 AM, John Smith <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:deltafoxtrot256@gmail.com">deltafoxtrot256@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On 30 May 2010 15:39, Anthony <<a href="mailto:osm@inbox.org">osm@inbox.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> "If the dispute can not be resolved through discussion, then the simple<br>
> default rule is that whatever name, designation, etc are used by the people<br>
> on the ground at that location are used in the non-localized tags."<br>
<br>
</div>Isn't that kinda asking for an edit war where there is disputed<br>
territory with different names by different languages possibly in<br>
multiple languages?<br>
</blockquote></div><br>From what I can tell, it was actually the solution to such an edit war. How "map what the people on the ground say" turned into "map what's on the ground", I can't figure out.<br>