The LWG license change proposals are on the table. Vote for them or against them. Nothing else.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Peter Körner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:osm-lists@mazdermind.de">osm-lists@mazdermind.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Am 11.08.2010 14:43, schrieb 80n:<div class="im"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
There needs to be an immediate vote, open to the whole community<br>
</blockquote></div>
Okay, then let's collect the different possible answers:<br>
<br>
- I don't mind, let the LWG do what they need to.<br>
- I want ODbL<br>
- I want ODbL without relicensing clause<br>
- I don't want ODbL but will accept it if the license change takes<br>
place anyway<br>
- I don't want ODbL and want my data to be removed if the license<br>
change takes place anyway<br>
<br>
Please help to get this list complete.<br><font color="#888888">
<br>
Peter<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>