Hey<div><br></div><div>What account did you use? Looking back over the history for what I thought was you (<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Steve%20Bennett">http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Steve%20Bennett</a>) there are no edits for any of your past history that include anywhere in the bounding box in the link you specified.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Steve<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 28 January 2011 02:50, Steve Bennett <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stevagewp@gmail.com">stevagewp@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi all,<br>
In early 2010, I added a relation "Overland Track" (with type=route,<br>
route=foot, network=rwn) to all the segments of that track in<br>
Tasmania. The relation is now gone:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://osm.lonvia.de/world_hiking.html?zoom=13&lat=-41.83815&lon=146.03379&layers=FFBT" target="_blank">http://osm.lonvia.de/world_hiking.html?zoom=13&lat=-41.83815&lon=146.03379&layers=FFBT</a><br>
<br>
(The main track itself should show up highlighted, not just the lwn<br>
offshoots...)<br>
<br>
Are there any tools available to investigate this kind of thing? Yes,<br>
obviously I can and will re-create the relation, but it would be<br>
useful to know what happened to it. I can see someone made some<br>
related changes, and I've contacted them, but no response yet.<br>
<br>
One piece of the track is way 50802374<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Steve<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>