<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>Don't count your chickens until they are hatched.<br><br><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.289062); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.222656); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.222656); ">Steve</span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.285156); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.21875); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.21875);"><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.289062); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.222656); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.222656); "><a href="http://stevecoast.com">stevecoast.com</a></span></div></div><div><br>On Feb 11, 2011, at 1:44, Chris Browet <<a href="mailto:cbro@semperpax.com">cbro@semperpax.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:40, Andrew Ayre <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andy@britishideas.com"><a href="mailto:andy@britishideas.com">andy@britishideas.com</a></a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
What is the point of spreading unfounded FUD? OSM doesn't need Microsoft to exist anyway.<br></blockquote></div><br>I think he meant that now that MS will have access to Navteq, there is more than reasonable doubts regarding their future involvment in OSM...<br>
<br>- Chris -<br><br>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>talk mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>