<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 12/04/2011 19:56, Michael Collinson wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4DA4A066.6040207@ayeltd.biz" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<br>
As part of the process, the legal wording of the Contributor Terms
has
been improved [3] on the basis of community feedback received and
to
make them more friendly to individual contributors. The
human-readable
version of the Contributor Terms is unchanged [4].<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4DA4A066.6040207@ayeltd.biz" type="cite">
[3] The revised contributor terms showing exactly what has been
changed:<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://docs.google.com/a/stiernegrip.se/document/pub?id=1jY58fD3JyNUjzmecrpNejoOt4OnfHeEM-6o8rD5hCLY">https://docs.google.com/a/stiernegrip.se/document/pub?id=1jY58fD3JyNUjzmecrpNejoOt4OnfHeEM-6o8rD5hCLY</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Mike,<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/terms">"https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/terms"</a> appears unchanged. Is
that some sort of caching effect, or does "has
been improved" actually mean "is about to be improved, but has not
been yet"?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Andy<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>