<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt">We also discuss frequently on the strategic mailing list, so there's asynchronous options as well to participate. For people who want to discuss things reasonably, that is.<br><div> </div>== Mikel Maron ==<br>+14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron<div><br></div><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><br><div style="font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Dave F. <davefox@madasafish.com><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> OSM Talk <talk@openstreetmap.org><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Tue, May 3, 2011 6:53:45 PM<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [OSM-talk] New Logo
in the Wiki<br></font><br>
On 02/05/2011 13:36, Grant Slater wrote:<br>> OK, lets find a time that works better. World Time Server Meeting<br><span>> planner: <a target="_blank" href="http://bit.ly/kBuc2L">http://bit.ly/kBuc2L</a></span><br>> 1pm UTC seems like the best option to me or what do you think? Or<br>> maybe we should alternate?<br><br>What part of "Don't use IRC" did you not comprehend?<br><br>Just because you've got used to having disturbed sleep cycles does not make it a universal useful discussion forum.<br><br>If you & OSMF & SWG (or whatever you call yourselves nowadays) insist on using IRC you'll have to put up with the dissenting calls of intentional exclusivity.<br><br>Dave F.<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>talk mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org" href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br><span><a target="_blank"
href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a></span><br></div></div>
</div></body></html>