<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Richard,<br><br>I am appreciative of the lengthy reply, but I really feal like you haven't read what i have asked.<br><br>Firstly let me say that I havn't been away for a long time. I simply haven't been editing much recently (I'm assuming you say this based on my edit log or something). I have read much, often, and gathered data intensively in this period. I do stand corrected however on the designation=public footway, and apologies for not finding this; however it doesn't render and is a sub-page listing, so it doesn't actually devalidate the original point. If you point was valid, then I would expect to have a clear answer returned at me, and to find myself quite stumped. Yes I have barged in, but I am welcoming a barge back out the door with an answer. Hell, I wan't nothing more than to have it thrown back at me. (question repeated at the bottom)<br><br>foot=yes, horse=yes i explained the problem about in previeous emails. a motorway is more than car=yes. It's a bundle. This is more than just a word issue. It doesn't get render results, and would be hard to.<br><pre>"we optimise for ease of mapping" - I agree that this is where to go, but I don't see it in this case.</pre>You then go onto explain highway=footway bicycle=permissive etc. I understand this, this isn't new, hell it's been around years.<br><br>What you are doing is taking 'tweak' tags, to modify a 'bundle' tag (yes made up terminology, but hopefully it makes it clear). Rendering a set of 'tweaks' would be a lot of work, and wouldn't correctly define something. It would also require modifcation on any change in the 'real world' which wouldn't be required with a 'bundle'. However...again, if it renders and is correctly mapped, does it matter, i don't know.<br><br>Again to the 'ice the cake' I know all of this. I don't want to seem big headed, but this isn't isn't a 'new development' that I haven't considered, and it seems somewhat like what I have said is, ironically, has been walked in on and your telling me I've approached it all wrong.<br><br>I'm sure many people are happily mapping, but if you look at the renders, it doesn't represent quite what is there, and i can't really explain this in any more detail.<br><br>Also, I have no idea how to take this to talk-gb, except by simply replying there not here, and breaking up a string of responses. I did however justify why it's here, which your welcome to read. I'm still struggling some what with getting these replies in the right place, so sorry about that.<br><br>So to get back on track, and I think the answer is clear. There is no way to get a byway on a track to render as a byway on a track on either mapnik or osmarender. Is that correct? And if so, does the current tagging scehem simply require a render change to allow this, and if so I shall move on to a render request/proposal where needed and forget about all the other points I initially stated and that have been missed.<br><br>Ben<br><br> </body>
</html>