<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I'm staying out of the discussion, just please remember the
PD-checkbox has no legal meaning, as documented here:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/We_Are_Changing_The_License#What_Are_The_Choices.3F">http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/We_Are_Changing_The_License#What_Are_The_Choices.3F</a><br>
<br>
Any retroactive change just isn't going to work.<br>
<br>
Simon<br>
<br>
Am 16.06.2011 22:08, schrieb Florian Lohoff:
<blockquote cite="mid:20110616200821.GB28424@pax.zz.de" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:49:36PM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">additionally clicked the PD checkbox. It would be possible, from a
database point of view, to set the PD option without setting the
"agreed to CT" field. We should do this manually for those users who
haven't agreed. In all other aspects they would be treated like
someone who hasn't agreed (could not continue to edit etc.) but the
PD flag would indicate to us that when it comes to deleting data we
don't have to delete that person's data.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
This should have been an option right from the beginning.
PD and ODBL/CT are non mutual exclusive options but the frontend makes
it one - So i am unable to click on PD without accepting CT/ODBL which
i think are the wrong way.
Flo
</pre>
<pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>