<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
    <br>
    I would suggest posting to talk-de, the resulting discussion will
    keep you occupied the next couple of months :-)<br>
    <br>
    Seriously, essentially the combinations with highway=(track,path)
    and bicycle=designated and highway=cycleway plus individual access
    tags for other vehicles/usage are  equivalent and which you prefer
    is nearly purely a matter of taste.<br>
    <br>
    In some countries (ie Germany, Switzerland) bicycle=designated has
    the implication that the way has to be used by bicycles (in Germany
    it's "slightly" more complicated), I assume that's not the case in
    the states.<br>
    <br>
    Simon<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    Am 22.06.2011 23:25, schrieb PJ Houser:
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:BANLkTi=pbnRkLVGUJD0V+5PVjwf=KmwGeg@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">Hi all,<br>
      <br>
      I sent this to the talk-us list, but responses have been few. I'm
      hoping a bit more dialogue could happen on the talk list.<br>
      <br>
      In Portland, Oregon, four interns at the local transit agency
      (TriMet - <a moz-do-not-send="true"
        href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TriMet">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TriMet</a>)
      are attempting to improve and update OSM so as to make it
      routable. TriMet will be switching to OpenTripPlanner (<a
        moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://opentripplanner.org/">http://opentripplanner.org/</a>,
      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
        href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenTripPlanner">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenTripPlanner</a>)
      in a few months, and will draw its base map from OSM. We are
      trying to make sure streets have correct geometry, directionality
      and names; intersections have turn restrictions; bike routes are
      properly tagged; and trails and pedestrian routes are up-to-date,
      accurate and tagged. The trip planner is multi-modal, meaning it
      incorporates bicycling, walking and transit, and combinations
      thereof. Anyways, the point is... <br>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">We have been tagging multi-use paths that
        are also considered bike routes as highway=path and
        bicycle=designated. Another user prefers highway=cycleway. What
        criteria do other mappers use to distinguish between a cycleway
        and multi-use path? <br>
        <br>
        Terms:<br>
        Cycleway: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway"
          target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway</a>
        "The highway=cycleway indicates that the used way is mainly or
        exclusively for bicycles. Some consider it better to use
        highway=path if use is not restricted to cyclists."<br>
        Path: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath"
          target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath</a>
        "This tag is used for paths for which all and any of
        highway=footway, highway=cycleway, and highway=bridleway would
        be inappropriate or inadequate (or simply not sufficient), but
        which are nonetheless usable for travel or navigation. They
        might be not intended for any particular use, or intended for
        several different uses. Intended uses can be indicated with the
        access=designated keys. It is also used for hiking trails."<br>
        <br>
        Some examples of multi-use paths that have switched between
        highway=cycleway and highway=path:<br>
        Eastbank Esplanade <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.portlandonline.com/parks/finder/index.cfm?PropertyID=105&action=ViewPark"
          target="_blank">http://www.portlandonline.com/parks/finder/index.cfm?PropertyID=105&action=ViewPark</a><br>
        Morrison Bridge Multi-use Path <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://bikeportland.org/2011/06/10/morrison-bridge-path-to-close-for-construction-project-54559"
          target="_blank">http://bikeportland.org/2011/06/10/morrison-bridge-path-to-close-for-construction-project-54559</a><br>
        Hawthorne Bridge, with both pedestrian and bicycle markings <a
          moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://bikeportland.org/2005/11/21/hawthorne-bridge-gets-new-markings-673"
          target="_blank">http://bikeportland.org/2005/11/21/hawthorne-bridge-gets-new-markings-673</a>.<br>
        <br>
        Traffic stats:<br>
        In 2008, the breakdown for peak-hour (4-6 pm) usage of these
        trails shows that cyclists usually dominate, but pedestrians
        make up 15% to 50% of the traffic. <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.portlandonline.com/transportation/index.cfm?c=34778&a=292746"
          target="_blank">http://www.portlandonline.com/transportation/index.cfm?c=34778&a=292746</a><br>
        <div class="im"><br>
          Thanks!<br clear="all">
          --<br>
          PJ Houser<br>
          Trimet<br>
          GIS intern<br>
        </div>
        username: PJ Houser<br>
      </div>
      <pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>