<font><font face="verdana,sans-serif">Fascinating, </font></font><font><font face="verdana,sans-serif">I was always taught that reliability was the most important thing to end users.<br><br>In Ottawa it looks like many footpaths, steps etc will be the big losers. The imported road network looks fine. <br>
<br>So it looks like the tools and specialist maps for the disabled, ones that make use of details mapped by hand about access will be what suffers the most.<br><br>Do we care about the end users of our maps, who perhaps have come to depend on them. I suspect the blind community for one will be less embracing of OSM if its reliability track record is less than perfect.<br>
<br>Or is it just one of those unplanned things that happens, there seems so many with OSM.<br><br>Cheerio John<br><br></font></font><div class="gmail_quote">On 13 December 2011 13:08, Adam Hoyle <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:adam.lists@dotankstudios.com">adam.lists@dotankstudios.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div>Wow, that's scary, most of the major towns around where I live are going to cease to be.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Actually, I've just looked in more detail at some of the areas I've been editing, and think there is a bug somewhere.</div><div><br></div><div>For example (there are a lot more examples):</div>
<div><br></div><div><a href="http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfe&lon=-0.81228&lat=51.72366&zoom=17" target="_blank">http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfe&lon=-0.81228&lat=51.72366&zoom=17</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>Shows a path with red nodes, but I added that and no-one else has edited, and as far as I know I've signed the updated license thing. (I am 'atom oil' on <a href="http://openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">openstreetmap.org</a>). Also other paths around that are edited only by me and don't show up as red, so that's inconsistent at least.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Do I need to file this as a bug somewhere (can anyone point me where please?).</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div>Adam</div><br><div><div>On 13 Dec 2011, at 08:46, Frederik Ramm wrote:</div>
<br><blockquote type="cite"><div>Hi,<br><br> apologies if this is the 2nd or 3rd time you're reading this, I have posted to dev and legal-talk yesterday in the hope that any major bugs could be ironed out before I announce this to a wider audience.<br>
<br>I have added a world-wide license change map to OSM Inspector:<br><br><a href="http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfe&lon=-1.80469&lat=35.88371&zoom=2" target="_blank">http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfe&lon=-1.80469&lat=35.88371&zoom=2</a><br>
<br>This is based on the per-object data I have on <a href="http://wtfe.gryph.de" target="_blank">wtfe.gryph.de</a>, combined with a current planet file. The view is updated nightly.<br><br>There's also statistics on the number of objects here:<br>
<br><a href="http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/munin.html" target="_blank">http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/munin.html</a><br><br>And detailed information here:<br><br><a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Remapping/License_Change_View_on_OSM_Inspector" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Remapping/License_Change_View_on_OSM_Inspector</a> <br>
<br>Bye<br>Frederik<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>talk mailing list<br><a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>