<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div><span>So look. There have been many reasonable questions and discussions on this topic, good. </span></div><div><span>But moderation in still going to happen (is happening) on inflammatory posts and attacks. </span></div><div><br></div><div>-Moderators</div><div> </div><div>* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; margin-top: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> <div style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; "> <div style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; "> <div dir="ltr"> <font size="2" face="Arial"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Nick Hocking <nick.hocking@gmail.com><br> <b><span style="font-weight:
bold;">To:</span></b> talk@openstreetmap.org <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Saturday, January 28, 2012 1:49 AM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [OSM-talk] Critical Mass for license change-over<br> </font> </div> <br>
<div id="yiv577957672"><div>andrzej wrote</div><div>>Nick,</div><div>>On 28 January 2012 05:43, Nick Hocking <nick.hocking en <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://gmail.com">gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> NE2/NE3 (Nathan) wrote<br>>><br>>> "This condescending tone isn't useful. We should all care about the<br>
>> entire map, not just our little area."</div><div>>So which part of this quote do you not agree with?</div><div> </div><div>It's the hypocrisy of one of the licence change whingers<br>telling someone like Frederik that he should</div>
<div>"care about the entire map"</div><div>This hyprocrisy beggers belief.</div><div>For about a year we have been inundated with whinging<br>about "you can't change the licence because I don't<br>agree with the decisions of the licence debate/votes".</div>
<div>Now, when we are finally about to resolve the tainted<br>data issues, all we see are the licence whingers desperately<br>wailing "you can't change the licence for 60 or 70 years" (1)<br>because we may lose some roads and I'm not about to do any hard<br>
work to remap them for the project".</div><div>If the licence whingers could put a sock in it, that'd be great.<br>If they could help with the remapping that would be even better,<br>but I'm probably hoping for too much there.</div>
<div><br>(1) I always exaggerate</div>
</div><br>_______________________________________________<br>talk mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org" href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br><br><br> </div> </div> </blockquote></div> </div></body></html>