<div class="gmail_quote">2012/3/7 Steve Bennett <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stevagewp@gmail.com">stevagewp@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Steve Bennett <<a href="mailto:stevagewp@gmail.com">stevagewp@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> If this actually happens, it will be by far the stupidest thing OSM<br>
> has ever done. But maybe I'm misunderstanding the meaning of that<br>
> phrase about "database rebuilding"?<br>
<br>
</div>Since I'm getting some off-list snark about this, let me make clear:<br>
<br>
1) I'm not arguing against the licence change<br>
2) I am participating in remapping<br>
3) I'm questioning deleting large amounts of data from our map on the<br>
self-imposed deadline of April 1<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I agree with you. </div><div>The license change is ok but: the big sites (Foursquare) must have the possibility to use the CC-BY-SA database also after the 1st April, till we have remapped almost all lacking data.</div>
<div>I don't know if it's possible, but new contributions can be "backported" to the old database?</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
Steve<br>
<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Stefano</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
_______________________________________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>