<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
The PD check box doesn't influence anything, so as a consequence it
doesn't cause any problems either.<br>
<br>
Simon<br>
<br>
Am 22.03.2012 11:20, schrieb sabas88:<br>
<span style="white-space: pre;">><br>
><br>
> Il giorno 22/mar/2012 11:14, "Simon Poole" <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:simon@poole.ch">simon@poole.ch</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:simon@poole.ch"><mailto:simon@poole.ch></a>> ha scritto:<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Not quite sure what your question is, but yes naturally
any user that hasn't agreed to the CTs can still agree and have
his data included (at least up to mid next week).<br>
><br>
> Nope, I've accepted long time ago but I checked the PD
option.<br>
> If there would be issues again on relicensing I'd like to put
my edits odbl only..<br>
><br>
> ><br>
> > This should not be a problem for anybody that considers
their contributions PD anyway, but this is OSM, you can make a
problem out of anything :-).<br>
> ><br>
> > Simon<br>
> ><br>
> > Am 22.03.2012 11:09, schrieb sabas88:<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >> Il giorno 22/mar/2012 11:00, "Simon Poole"
<<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:simon@poole.ch">simon@poole.ch</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:simon@poole.ch"><mailto:simon@poole.ch></a>> ha scritto:<br>
> >><br>
> >> ><br>
> >><br>
> >> > c) we are providing mechanisms (changeset level
overrides, "adoption")<br>
> >> > that allow PD data to be carried forward,
preferably after consultation<br>
> >> > with the mapper in question<br>
> >> ><br>
> >> > Simon<br>
> >><br>
> >> If PD option is a problem, users can have a way to
switch to ODbL?<br>
> >> Stefano<br>
></span><br>
<br>
</body>
</html>