<div>You'd have to ask the City of Utrecht whether their "main cycle routes" are signed. If they've officially identified a particular set of routes, that would seem to be fairly clear-cut. See their city website: <a href="http://www.utrecht.nl/images/dso/infraprojecten/fiets/fietsroutes.html">http://www.utrecht.nl/images/dso/infraprojecten/fiets/fietsroutes.html</a></div>
<div> </div><div>Richard</div><div><br><br> </div><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Richard Fairhurst <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:richard@systemed.net" target="_blank">richard@systemed.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">Richard Mann wrote:<br>
> My point is that tagging should allow both types of routes to be<br>
> recorded<br>
<br>
</div>We tag what's on the ground, whether it's route signage, cycle-specific<br>
infrastructure, or a giant woolly mammoth (<a href="http://url.ie/f9ts" target="_blank">http://url.ie/f9ts</a>).<br>
<br>
Are you suggesting a deviation from that?<br>
<br>
cheers<br>
Richard<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OSM-cycle-map-excessive-focus-on-long-distance-routes-tp5697183p5697391.html" target="_blank">http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OSM-cycle-map-excessive-focus-on-long-distance-routes-tp5697183p5697391.html</a><br>

Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
</div><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>