<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 09.08.2012 15:10, schrieb ce-test,
qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA489140856@ZEUS.cetest.local"
type="cite">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">I declare the new map
still to be CC-BY-SA and not ODBL<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</blockquote>
Well...<br>
Your examples have to be investigated and fixed, I'm sure, but here
you're completely right:<br>
OSM is still licensed as CC-BY-SA currently as far as I know.<br>
<br>
Who told you it has changed the license, yet?<br>
<br>
So it's perfectly clean up to know.<br>
Sure: There may be problems that should prevent from finally
switching to odbl, and yes, some examples might be the ones you
mentioned.<br>
Sure: we might not find every single piece where such problems exist
- just like you probably don't have any idea how to find copyright
problems in your fork.<br>
There have been copyright infringements by copies from google and
others before, and ususally they have been found and fixed, because
somebody reported these to osm, in a most often constructive way.<br>
<br>
Unluckily you're not constructive in the way you report these
problems - but nobody expected that from you, I fear. <br>
At least you mentioned user names and fuzzy regions where further
investigation might start, while of course it would have been easier
to solve with direct references, but sure: you don't want to help,
you want to flame again and again.<br>
That's boring, sorry.<br>
<br>
regards<br>
Peter<br>
</body>
</html>