<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:10pt"><div><br></div><div><span>2012-09-20 <font face="Arial" size="2">Lester Caine <lester at lsces.co.uk></font></span></div><br>> Comment fields are not documented as well as they should be and the
'problem' that instigated this thread is to my view of what's<br>> on line a
very good example of why there WAS a problem. Correctly flagging
information is essential and we do perhaps need<br>> a little more
'automatic' actions. I can see that the French data is perhaps not
suited to a 'single import' which is then the problem,<br>> since multiple
imports already processed in some way are just as much a problem? Lets
try and make the 'initial' import as clean<br>> as possible even if that has
to be to a staging area from which packets can be taken and manually
processed. Identification can <br>> then be married back to the raw data in a
location where anybody can see it?<br><br>Do you mean that documenting well the comment field would be a satisfactory solution?<div> </div><div><span style="font-style:italic;color:rgb(0, 0, 191);font-weight:bold;">Pierre </span><br> <br></div> </div></body></html>