<div dir="ltr">Agreed. I think that either "With OSM" or "Powered By OSM" would explain the relationship a bit better than "By OSM" which suggests explicit authorship of whatever is displaying the watermark. That might not always be the case.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Michal Migurski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mike@teczno.com" target="_blank">mike@teczno.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto"><div>What about “with OSM” instead of “by OSM”?<br><br><div>-mike.</div><div><br></div>---------------------------------------<div>michal migurski <a href="http://mike.teczno.com" target="_blank">http://mike.teczno.com</a></div>
</div><div><br>On Apr 22, 2013, at 7:39 AM, Simon Poole <<a href="mailto:simon@poole.ch" target="_blank">simon@poole.ch</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<br>
The copyright page is now much better than before and IMHO contains
the necessary contents. There are a couple of wording issues that
are already present in the current version that we should address
while we're at it (but that is mainly CWG/OWG turf) but nothing
major.<br>
<br>
I do have a couple of issues with the icon though. First while I'm
sure we would like to take credit for everything OSMish, doesn't "by
OSM" imply the wrong thing? What we want to say is I suspect "Data
by OSM", that naturally would be rather unwiedly. Further there may
be a potential (legal) issue with using OSM in that way that I need
to discuss with counsel.<br>
<br>
But all in all a nice step forward.<br>
<br>
Simon<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>Am 22.04.2013 14:40, schrieb Alex
Barth:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hello everyone -</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I'd love to start pushing again on the OSM
attribution mark.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This is an updated proposal based on an initial RFC from
earlier this year titled "Contributor Mark" [1, 2]. Sorry for
the delay in following up with adjustments based on feedback
on the original thread. <br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Again, the goal of this proposal is to draw more attention
to OpenStreetMap wherever it's used by introducing a visually
compelling, linked symbol for placement on OSM-based works and
by explaining OpenStreetMap better at the place where this
symbol links to.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Looking forward to your feedback. I'll also be
reaching out to corresponding working groups and OSMF to see
how we can move this forward.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Concretely, this RFC proposes</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1. Replace current credit "© OpenStreetMap Contributors"
with a visual mark where possible</div>
<div>2. Update `<a href="http://openstreetmap.org/copyright%60" target="_blank">openstreetmap.org/copyright`</a>
to explain better OSM, to invite visitors to join and to allow
creators of derivative work to link back to their sites.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The update to the original RFC brings 4 key changes: </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1. Rename the proposal from 'Contributor Mark' to
'Attribution Mark'</div>
<div>2. A completely redesigned mark, containing the letters
"OSM"</div>
<div>3. A completely redesigned `/copyright` page, the page the
mark links to. It is much closer to today's `/copyright`</div>
<div>4. The mark is an alternative to "© OpenStreetMap
Contributors". Only where the mark can't be used, "©
OpenStreetMap Contributors" may be used.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please read up on all details on the newly created RFC
page:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RFC_Attribution_Mark" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RFC_Attribution_Mark</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Also take a look at the repository containing artwork and
code:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="https://github.com/osmlab/attribution-mark" target="_blank">https://github.com/osmlab/attribution-mark</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Alex<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>--</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>[1] Initial RFC <a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2013-January/065784.html" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2013-January/065784.html</a>
</div>
<div>[2] Feedback summary <a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2013-January/065860.html" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2013-January/065860.html</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>talk mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">talk@openstreetmap.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a></span><br></div></blockquote></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>