<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>> From: talk-request@openstreetmap.org<br>> Subject: talk Digest, Vol 104, Issue 33<br>> To: talk@openstreetmap.org<br>> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 18:49:09 +0000<br>> Message: 7<br>> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:49:00 -0500<br>> From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursamundi.org><br>> To: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist@gmail.com><br>> Cc: "talk@openstreetmap.org" <talk@openstreetmap.org><br>> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Native American/First Nation, etc. Reservation<br>> Boundaries<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <CAMPM96pie6-db=tOkPESR6KGPHQmf-Oiz0OoqXjFAHdEj=4Zyw@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>> <br>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist@gmail.com<br>> > wrote:<br>> > Am 21/apr/2013 um 19:59 schrieb Paul Johnson <a href="mailto:baloo@ursamundi.org">baloo@ursamundi.org</a>:<br>> > > Is rendering the issue or tagging?<br>> > Yes.<br>> > IMHO we should get the tagging right and rendering will follow. As we<br>> > don't have similar situations in Europe it is unlikely that this is already<br>> > implemented<br>> ><br>> I still maintain Scotland, North Ireland and Wales are analogous<br>> situations.<BR><div> </div><div>Martin,</div><div>Although GB seems to be different to the USA, the basis is an agreement isnt it ? The tribal borders will however cross admin state borders since the tribal area's or countries do have a wider range.</div><div>Greetz</div> </div></body>
</html>