<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="-1">Maybe a good time to work on this proposal:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/floodplain">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/floodplain</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Þann 16.2.2014 19:12, skrifaði
Christoph Hormann:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:201402162012.30586.chris_hormann@gmx.de"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sunday 16 February 2014, Pieren wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Someone is mapping the UK floods in OSM (reported on twitter):
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258412163">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258412163</a>
Very bad idea.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Yes, but note the wiki currently does not give any guidelines what
degree of permanency is required for a body of water to be mapped as
natural=water. There are many other examples of areas which are - if
at all - merely sporadically covered with water to the extent they are
mapped like:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23938237">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23938237</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26645398">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26645398</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/253952">http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/253952</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183083855">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183083855</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71290542">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71290542</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>