<html><head></head><body>I think if someone in a community wants to volunteer for this kind of job, I think he/she would be welcome to the DWG.<br>
For language reason, he would certainly endorse local issues, but with a larger view: remember that OSM is a global project.<br>
<br>
Imagine the fun in dealing with someone not happy with the local DWG complaining to a main DWG ...<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 14 avril 2014 13:57:43 UTC+02:00, maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">Dear everyone,<br /><br />This is a thorny issue bit will ask anyway. ;)<br /><br />Not very often, but we do encounter questionable contributions.<br />Normally, local mappers would contact the specific contributor to<br />explain and provide guidance. But in some cases, these messages were<br />ignored and the contributor continues to do questionable edits.<br /><br />There is a DWG [0] to resolve such issue. We do understand that DWG<br />members are volunteers like most of us and local issues might not get<br />attention immediately. I would like to discuss the possibility for<br />our local chapter/community to form our own sort of DWG where we can<br />address local concerns/disputes.<br /><br />We have a few active and trusted volunteers who can discuss and<br />resolve such issues. But in rare occasions we think we should have<br />the rights to do "temporary blocks" within our local areas.<br /><br />[0] <a
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group">wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group</a></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.</body></html>