<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Edward Betts <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:edward@4angle.com" target="_blank">edward@4angle.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I'd like to annotate these 70k objects in OSM with a Wikidata tag<br>
automatically.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1. As somebody who would like closer integration between Wikimedia projects like Wikidata and OSM, I definitely agree with the proposal. The methodology, as explained, is quite conservative and I checked a few matches in my country and they are all good. As suggested by someone, maybe bridges should be excluded for now because of the split ways problem.<br>
<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Does anybody have a strong preference that the edits are split up by region,<br>
or loaded in batches?<br></blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Splitting the edits by region/country would be really preferable so that we mostly avoid the large changesets problem for this annotation task.<br>
</div></div>