<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17/09/2014 13:04, Martin
      Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTBY-qShLW5zGogodN44E8UvD-EOL-_mYwXZpMAKq65keg@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr"><br>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">2014-09-17 10:43 GMT+02:00 Dave F. <span
              dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:davefox@madasafish.com" target="_blank">davefox@madasafish.com</a>></span>:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span class="">
                  <div>On 16/09/2014 14:59, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                        <div class="gmail_quote">2014-09-16 15:32
                          GMT+02:00 Dave F. <span dir="ltr"><<a
                              moz-do-not-send="true"
                              href="mailto:davefox@madasafish.com"
                              target="_blank">davefox@madasafish.com</a>></span>:<br>
                          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                            style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px
                            #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                            <div style="overflow:hidden">I find it
                              surprising something as arbitrary as size
                              is used as the defining factor. Comparing
                              actual tags would surely make more sense.<span></span></div>
                          </blockquote>
                        </div>
                        <br>
                        <br>
                        well, size surely has some correlation with
                        importance. For practical reasons it is
                        generally working quite well to have first
                        render the bigger stuff and then render the
                        smaller stuff on top, because it leads typically
                        to less covering.<br>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </blockquote>
                  <br>
                </span> This, IMO, is lazy rendering & should be
                discouraged. To allow the smaller stuff to display is
                one of the reason mutli-polygons were developed.</div>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
              <br>
              <br>
            </div>
            <div>no, multipolygons have nothing to do with this issue.
              Multipolygons are there to cut holes into polygons or to
              build polygons from outer ways which are also otherwise
              used. Here they would not serve at all, as the park and
              the wood both occupy the same area (locally).<br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    True, for this case, but I was talking in more general terms.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTBY-qShLW5zGogodN44E8UvD-EOL-_mYwXZpMAKq65keg@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote"> 
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Refer also to the
                layer tag which is disappointingly under used by
                renderers. <br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
              <br>
            </div>
            <div>yes, it is indeed underused, but it also has nothing to
              do with the issue here, as both objects are on the same
              layer.<br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    That's my point. If the layer tagged was implemented by more
    renderers it would encourage mappers to use it, solving my current
    problem.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTBY-qShLW5zGogodN44E8UvD-EOL-_mYwXZpMAKq65keg@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span class=""> <br>
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div class="gmail_extra">In this particular case
                        more detailed mapping of the tree areas could
                        solve it, e.g. split the wood object at the
                        cutting roads and waterways, but admittedly in
                        this case by looking at the bing aerial imagery
                        it seems indeed to be a continuity of trees on
                        both sides of these.<br>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </blockquote>
                  <br>
                </span> That's mapping incorrectly to suit the renderer
                &, for obvious reasons, should be criticized. <br>
                <br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
              <br>
            </div>
            <div>how would splitting an area be incorrect? It is just
              another representation of the same. There are infinite
              correct ways to representate the same object.<br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    As an example: If it has a name you'd have two objects of that name,
    when in fact there's only one. If someone wanted to find out how
    many named wood there are in a city it would return inaccurate data.
    <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTBY-qShLW5zGogodN44E8UvD-EOL-_mYwXZpMAKq65keg@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>cheers,<br>
            </div>
            <div>Martin<br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  
<br /><br />
<hr style='border:none; color:#909090; background-color:#B0B0B0; height: 1px; width: 99%;' />
<table style='border-collapse:collapse;border:none;'>
        <tr>
                <td style='border:none;padding:0px 15px 0px 8px'>
                        <a href="http://www.avast.com/">
                                <img border=0 src="http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png" />
                        </a>
                </td>
                <td>
                        <p style='color:#3d4d5a; font-family:"Calibri","Verdana","Arial","Helvetica"; font-size:12pt;'>
                                This email is free from viruses and malware because <a href="http://www.avast.com/">avast! Antivirus</a> protection is active.
                        </p>
                </td>
        </tr>
</table>
<br />
</body>
</html>