<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font size="-1"><big>Adding surface tags sounds more like an upgrade
than an outbreak. Tagging for the router surely means that you
are tagging roads based on their finer properties, single-lane
or dual-lane, asphalt or gravel etc.<br>
<br>
Also if the road is less traveled it sounds like a no-brainer to
tag it as unclassified instead of tertiary?<br>
<br>
The bicycle router seems to give same result as car router in my
area?<br>
</big><br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Þann 17.2.2015 00:14, skrifaði Jo
Walsh:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1424132052.3953799.228346225.25ECB5A2@webmail.messagingengine.com"
type="cite">
<title></title>
<div> </div>
<div>On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 08:19 PM, Colin Smale wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<p>+1 to that! Hope it doesn't lead to an outbreak of "tagging
for the router" though... You know, down/upgrading roads to
"improve" the results...<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<div>Anecdatally, I would say that outbreak is well in hand
already :/<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>