<div dir="ltr">I should have written "then there is no need" (with "then" when there is a name or ref that stays the same)<div>in the other cases you need a relation.<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:18 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:phil@trigpoint.me.uk" target="_blank">phil@trigpoint.me.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><br>
<br>
On Mon Apr 27 15:07:45 2015 GMT+0100, Marc Gemis wrote:<br>
> As long as the name (or the ref/int_ref) of the street remains the same, I<br>
> think the router should be able to give other messages than "turn right".<br>
> There is no need for an additional relation IMHO.<br>
><br>
</span>There is often no ref, or name. If there is a name it will often change.<br>
<br>
Phil (trigpoint )<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">><br>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Lester Caine <<a href="mailto:lester@lsces.co.uk">lester@lsces.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > On 27/04/15 10:45, <a href="mailto:phil@trigpoint.me.uk">phil@trigpoint.me.uk</a> wrote:<br>
> > >> == Question ==<br>
> > >> ><br>
> > >> > Could we benefit from a new route relation? For example a<br>
> > "route_continues"<br>
> > >> > relation? Would others find this useful?<br>
> > >> ><br>
> > > And more importantly, if you need to turn off onto the minor road going<br>
> > straight ahead it remains 'silent'.<br>
> > > I have occasionally used a through_route relation in these cases, but<br>
> > lack of support from routers does make it seem futile.<br>
> > > Much like the via way relation, that one is so needed too.<br>
> ><br>
> > Why do I find that confusing?<br>
> ><br>
> > Currently in general the directions ignore corners even if there are<br>
> > roads going off those corners. The complaint is about 'extra' directions<br>
> > where the corner is actually the main road and the straight on branch is<br>
> > the turning. If the directions remain silent one would in some<br>
> > conditions get confused so the safe thing to do is announce both?<br>
> ><br>
> > The correct wording of the the directions should be perhaps 'road bares<br>
> > right' and 'go straight on' rather than 'turn right' but that does need<br>
> > the perhaps missing "through_route" information? As I said, the<br>
> > inclusion of road names in OSMAND while useful at times does get<br>
> > similarly annoying when a 'continue on Axxx' would suffice. In this case<br>
> > the road id provides the "through_route" information ... one remains on<br>
> > the same road ... and the straight on road has a different one which may<br>
> > just be 'minor road'.<br>
> ><br>
> > --<br>
> > Lester Caine - G8HFL<br>
> > -----------------------------<br>
> > Contact - <a href="http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact" target="_blank">http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact</a><br>
> > L.S.Caine Electronic Services - <a href="http://lsces.co.uk" target="_blank">http://lsces.co.uk</a><br>
> > EnquirySolve - <a href="http://enquirysolve.com/" target="_blank">http://enquirysolve.com/</a><br>
> > Model Engineers Digital Workshop - <a href="http://medw.co.uk" target="_blank">http://medw.co.uk</a><br>
> > Rainbow Digital Media - <a href="http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk" target="_blank">http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk</a><br>
> ><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > talk mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> > <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
> ><br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">--<br>
Sent from my Jolla<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>