<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /></head><body style='font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'>
<p> </p>
<div> </div>
<p>A boundary couldn't be "the river" as a river has non-zero width. It might be the "centre line", "deepest line", "fastest flowing bit" ..... but it cannot be "the river" without further qualification.</p>
<p>On 2015-10-14 11:31, Frederik Ramm wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">Hi,<br /><br /> On 10/14/2015 10:56 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0"> (If this happens - if the boundary is defined by the river or the<br /> highway - then you still have various options of modeling this, for<br /> example having two ways share the same nodes, <br /><br /> wouldn't this kind of modelling be "wrong"? If the boundary IS the<br /> river, there shouldn't be 2 different objects there, should they?</blockquote>
<br /> Academic detail. "Is" the boundary the river, or is the boundary a thing<br /> its own right, the geometry of which is described by the river? I think<br /> you can argue either way.<br /><br /> Bye<br /> Frederik</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>