<p dir="ltr">Ok i agree, the rendering is not so important and i can use other tools, but why i can't search abandoned stuff with nominatim? this is not so logic in my opinion. If the data is present why i can't find it with a regular search on <a href="http://openstreetmap.org">openstreetmap.org</a> for example? this is not a rendering problem.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">Il 06/Gen/2016 06:40, "Marc Gemis" <<a href="mailto:marc.gemis@gmail.com">marc.gemis@gmail.com</a>> ha scritto:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">As soon as you record the data it is in the database, it doesn't<br>
matter whether it is rendered on the standard map or not.<br>
I think that if you need "stats" on abandoned buildings or shops, that<br>
you will load the data into your own database or a GIS system such as<br>
QGIS, where you can really analyse and visualise the data.<br>
Another quick solution for visualisation would be to use Overpass<br>
Turbo or Overpass in combination with umap. No need to wait until<br>
others do the work for you :-)<br>
<br>
<br>
regards<br>
<br>
m<br>
<br>
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:42 PM, John Doe <<a href="mailto:theguestone@gmail.com">theguestone@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> In my opinion objects with abandoned prefix should be introduced in<br>
> nominatim for searches and in mapnik to see them (with a different render<br>
> obviously).<br>
> OSM can be an important database also for stats about abandoned<br>
> buildings/houses in our cities.<br>
> Some organization (also the public administration) can be interested in<br>
> research and exploitation of these places and OSM can be a great base.<br>
><br>
> Il 05/Gen/2016 13:29, "Mateusz Konieczny" <<a href="mailto:matkoniecz@gmail.com">matkoniecz@gmail.com</a>> ha scritto:<br>
>><br>
>> On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:14:25 +0100<br>
>> John Doe <<a href="mailto:theguestone@gmail.com">theguestone@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> > I tagged some abandoned building in my native city with<br>
>> > abandoned:building=yes (as wiki) and the building name but now i can't<br>
>> > search these ones with nominatim (no results) and none of these<br>
>> > appears on mapnik.<br>
>> > Is prefix abandoned before building=yes really correct?<br>
>><br>
>> "I tagged some abandoned building in my native city with<br>
>> abandoned:building=yes"<br>
>><br>
>> I think it is mistake. abandoned: prefix makes sense for things like<br>
>> shops where there is a fundamental difference between active shop (POI<br>
>> - it is possible to buy something there or provides some services).<br>
>><br>
>> abandoned:shop, abandoned:amenity is solely an orientation point.<br>
>><br>
>> In case of buildings there is no such fundamental difference between<br>
>> used and unused one.<br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> talk mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
><br>
</blockquote></div>