<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>In some aspects wikipedia is completely different than OSM, for
example WP has the rule of "no original research", we on the other
hand want exactly that (via survey). Adding a WP article on an
object would require you finding citable third party sources with
information on the object, it is not enough that you've been there
and have seen say a sign is not enough.</p>
<p>Simon<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 14.11.2016 um 15:11 schrieb RB:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADD9P_kCppq9=kvjoXWgLYcZQ0XoPUJg2ua7cH8u4pnQ4B1x7g@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>I just discovered the wikidata project and felt like
contributing and adding wikidata tags to OSM objects.
However, as I discovered that localities (such as <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/421656183">Javerne</a>)
aren't mostly covered by wikipedia articles, I created a
few. This led to all the 3 localities pages I had created
being deleted by the wikipedia moderators.<br>
<br>
</div>
Is it like an official policy and if yes is it still worth to
link localities to orphan wikidata objects?<br>
<br>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>