<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/01/2017 22:24, Mikel Maron wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:1346892374.24222.1483568675657@mail.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<style type="text/css" scoped="">
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted {
margin-left: 0 !important;
border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important;
padding-left:1ex !important;
background-color:white !important;
}
</style> Ok I hear you. Let me walk this back a step.
Not the same standard, but a standard beyond now that gives some
visibility to the process. I know there is a process of
monitoring, analysis, communication and action followed by the
DWG. Let's document that. And a simple not burdensome log of
actions - summarizing the above. This visibility will improve
community understanding of the process, help to spot trends, and
improve everyone's work overall.</blockquote>
<br>
Well if it helps, my answer yesterday to this help question<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/53812/contested-border-sahrawi-morocco-decision-to-display">https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/53812/contested-border-sahrawi-morocco-decision-to-display</a><br>
<br>
explains the process that was followed to try and come up with some
kind of consensus as to how to display that area in OSM. However,
what worked in that case may not be appropriate elsewhere because
each case is different - in fact the most common response that I
give to the DWG stuff that I deal with is just to try and get
everyone to talk to each other more to try and understand other
points of view, no other actions needed.<br>
<br>
Best Regards,<br>
<br>
Andy<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>